<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ponder, ponder, ponder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rarsh.com/2006/08/31/ponder-ponder-ponder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rarsh.com/2006/08/31/ponder-ponder-ponder/</link>
	<description>Semi-retired.  Semi-lucid.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 'im oop nawth</title>
		<link>http://www.rarsh.com/2006/08/31/ponder-ponder-ponder/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>'im oop nawth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarsh.com/2006/08/31/ponder-ponder-ponder/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I see it went to TigerTim - would that be another Roarer? or a Lion in disguise?

&lt;em&gt;Lionel: It must be another roarer.  'Twasn't me, at least.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see it went to TigerTim - would that be another Roarer? or a Lion in disguise?</p>
<p><em>Lionel: It must be another roarer.  &#8216;Twasn&#8217;t me, at least.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wuglums</title>
		<link>http://www.rarsh.com/2006/08/31/ponder-ponder-ponder/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Wuglums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rarsh.com/2006/08/31/ponder-ponder-ponder/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Hey, that "£2,000 off" eats into the £4,000 or so depreciation you suffer when you drive it off the forecourt (* cost to part-exchange price).  And - to its credit - there's only another £1,300 or so lost the following year.  New cars, eh.

If &lt;a href="http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/carreviews/review.aspx?model_id=1170&#38;page=2" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Parker's Guide&lt;/a&gt; is correct, then I don't envy you those trips to South Wales: 

"On the motorway, it's very noisy. Road, engine and (with the roof down) wind noise are so bad you should consider something else if motorways are your bag. Lorry drivers suffer from Copen-blindness. The ride is rough and made worse with the Sports Suspension pack fitted."

Or are you intending to keep the current Rarsh-mobile?

&lt;em&gt;Lionel: I am intending to keep the current rARshMobile (its trade in value's next to nothing anyway) and if I was travelling to Kairdiff in the Copen I'd be keeping off the motorways, I suspect, as they'd be a lot more fun.&lt;/em&gt; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that &#8220;£2,000 off&#8221; eats into the £4,000 or so depreciation you suffer when you drive it off the forecourt (* cost to part-exchange price).  And - to its credit - there&#8217;s only another £1,300 or so lost the following year.  New cars, eh.</p>
<p>If <a href="http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/carreviews/review.aspx?model_id=1170&amp;page=2" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Parker&#8217;s Guide</a> is correct, then I don&#8217;t envy you those trips to South Wales: </p>
<p>&#8220;On the motorway, it&#8217;s very noisy. Road, engine and (with the roof down) wind noise are so bad you should consider something else if motorways are your bag. Lorry drivers suffer from Copen-blindness. The ride is rough and made worse with the Sports Suspension pack fitted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or are you intending to keep the current Rarsh-mobile?</p>
<p><em>Lionel: I am intending to keep the current rARshMobile (its trade in value&#8217;s next to nothing anyway) and if I was travelling to Kairdiff in the Copen I&#8217;d be keeping off the motorways, I suspect, as they&#8217;d be a lot more fun.</em> <img src='http://www.rarsh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
