Comments on: Don’t worry, everybody. We’re all safe. http://www.rarsh.com/dont-worry-everybody-were-all-safe/ Now with micro-channels Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:30:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Wuglums http://www.rarsh.com/dont-worry-everybody-were-all-safe/#comment-3685 Wuglums Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:00:45 +0000 http://www.rarsh.com/2007/03/29/dont-worry-everybody-were-all-safe/#comment-3685 Really? Where are these proposals for "resticting our freedoms"? I agree that there is reportedly some hysteria in recent years about any photography involving children... (whither common sense). For another line on the petition see <a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2878/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Beware! This could also be the work of the "powers that be", trying to fool you. <em>Lionel: In making my reference to "restricting our freedoms" I was thinking specifically of sections 44 and 45 of the Terrorism Act, 2000, and the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act ridiculed by young Mr Thomas the other evening rather than any photographically specific plans.</em> Really? Where are these proposals for “resticting our freedoms”? I agree that there is reportedly some hysteria in recent years about any photography involving children… (whither common sense).

For another line on the petition see here. Beware! This could also be the work of the “powers that be”, trying to fool you.

Lionel: In making my reference to “restricting our freedoms” I was thinking specifically of sections 44 and 45 of the Terrorism Act, 2000, and the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act ridiculed by young Mr Thomas the other evening rather than any photographically specific plans.

]]>